<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photo Review Today&#187; [REVIEW:] Olympus camera review &#8211; Ilse Jurriën (LetsGoDigital) / Olympus /</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photoreviewtoday.com/tag/olympus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com</link>
	<description>Photographic reviews from around the planet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus camera review &#8211; Ilse Jurriën (LetsGoDigital)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-camera-review-ilse-jurrien-letsgodigital/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-camera-review-ilse-jurrien-letsgodigital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 11:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SP-600UZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-camera-review-ilse-jurrien-letsgodigital/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Olympus SP-600UZ is a 12 Megapixels megazoom digital camera with an impressive wide optical zoom covering a 28-840mm focal length. Time for our team to test how the Olympus SP-600 UZ performs in the field. There are more digital megazoom cameras from the competition and the differences between camera specifications become smaller and smaller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>The Olympus SP-600UZ is a 12 Megapixels megazoom digital camera  with an impressive wide optical zoom covering a 28-840mm focal length. Time for our team to test how the Olympus SP-600 UZ performs in the field. There are more digital megazoom cameras from the competition and the differences between camera specifications become smaller and smaller by the generation. — <font color="#00A121">Ilse Jurriën</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/26190/olympus-camera-reviews/">letsgodigital.org</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/SP-600UZ" rel="tag">SP-600UZ</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-camera-review-ilse-jurrien-letsgodigital/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-camera-review-ilse-jurrien-letsgodigital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus E-PL1 Review &#8211; Richard Butler (dpreview)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-richard-butler-dpreview/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-richard-butler-dpreview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-richard-butler-dpreview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As one half of the Micro Four Thirds consortium, Olympus was one of the originators of the mirrorless interchangeable lens or system camera. In a little under two years, this new breed has established itself as a credible alternative both to compact cameras and DSLRs. However, while manufacturers regularly talk to us about watching and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>As one half of the Micro Four Thirds consortium, Olympus was one of the originators of the mirrorless interchangeable lens or system camera. In a little under two years, this new breed has established itself as a credible alternative both to compact cameras and DSLRs. However, while manufacturers regularly talk to us about watching and wanting to exploit the gap between these two established types of cameras, all the models released so far have tended towards the DSLR-end of that space. So far we&#8217;ve seen models from both Panasonic and Samsung that have aped the functionality, handling and even appearance of entry-level DLSRs, while the small, rangefinder-styled MILCs (The E-P1 and GF1) have still behaved like DSLRs without mirrors, rather than compact cameras with large sensors. — <font color="#00A121">Richard Butler</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepl1/">dpreview.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Digital+Camera" rel="tag">Digital Camera</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/E-PL1" rel="tag">E-PL1</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-richard-butler-dpreview/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-richard-butler-dpreview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus E-PL1 Review &#8211; Eric Reagan (Photography Bay)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-eric-reagan-photography-bay/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-eric-reagan-photography-bay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 12:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-eric-reagan-photography-bay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Olympus E-PL1 is the latest in the line of PEN cameras, which prior models include the original E-P1 and the E-P2. The E-PL1 is the first PEN camera targeted at and priced toward the consumer market. As with the other PEN models, the E-PL1 is a Micro Four Thirds format camera and features a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>The Olympus E-PL1 is the latest in the line of PEN cameras, which prior models include the original E-P1  and the E-P2.  The E-PL1 is the first PEN camera targeted at and priced toward the consumer market.  As with the other PEN models, the E-PL1 is a Micro Four Thirds format camera and features a 2x crop factor over traditional 35mm sensors.  That means that the 14-42mm lens feels like a 28-84mm lens on a full frame camera. — <font color="#00A121">Eric Reagan</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2010/05/11/olympus-e-pl1-review/">photographybay.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/E-PL1" rel="tag">E-PL1</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-eric-reagan-photography-bay/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-review-eric-reagan-photography-bay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Camera Review &#8211; Not Just Tough &#8211; Image Acquire</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-tough-6020-camera-review-not-just-tough-image-acquire/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-tough-6020-camera-review-not-just-tough-image-acquire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stylus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tough]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-tough-6020-camera-review-not-just-tough-image-acquire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don’t hear much about “tough” cameras these days, which is why I was definitely surprised to lay hands on the oddly (but aptly) named Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 camera, which we talked about here on Friday. So how tough is it? Let’s have a look. — Image Acquire Source and Read More: image-acquire.com &#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>You don’t hear much about “tough” cameras these days, which is why I was definitely surprised to lay hands on the oddly (but aptly) named Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 camera, which we talked about here on Friday.  So how tough is it?  Let’s have a look. — <font color="#00A121">Image Acquire</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.image-acquire.com/4/">image-acquire.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Stylus" rel="tag">Stylus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Tough" rel="tag">Tough</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/6020" rel="tag">6020</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Digital+Camera" rel="tag">Digital Camera</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-tough-6020-camera-review-not-just-tough-image-acquire/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-tough-6020-camera-review-not-just-tough-image-acquire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus Stylus 7030 Digital Camera Review &#8211; Unbelievable Value &#8211; Image-Acquire</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-7030-digital-camera-review-unbelievable-value-image-acquire/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-7030-digital-camera-review-unbelievable-value-image-acquire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 11:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7030]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stylus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-7030-digital-camera-review-unbelievable-value-image-acquire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympus doesn’t put out very many cameras that I’ve come across–not near so many as Kodak and Nikon and the like, anyway–but when they do, they’ve usually done a pretty nice job. And today’s review target, the Olympus Stylus 7030, will prove to be exactly that: a pretty nice job. — Image Acquire Source and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Olympus doesn’t put out very many cameras that I’ve come across–not near so many as Kodak and Nikon and the like, anyway–but when they do, they’ve usually done a pretty nice job.  And today’s review target, the Olympus Stylus 7030, will prove to be exactly that: a pretty nice job. — <font color="#00A121">Image Acquire</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.image-acquire.com/olympus-stylus-7030-digital-camera-review-unbelievable-value/">image-acquire.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/7030" rel="tag">7030</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Digital+Camera" rel="tag">Digital Camera</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Stylus" rel="tag">Stylus</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-7030-digital-camera-review-unbelievable-value-image-acquire/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-stylus-7030-digital-camera-review-unbelievable-value-image-acquire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus Underwater Digital Camera Review &#8211; Benz (Afforfable Digital Camera)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-underwater-digital-camera-review-benz-afforfable-digital-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-underwater-digital-camera-review-benz-afforfable-digital-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-underwater-digital-camera-review-benz-afforfable-digital-camera/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Underwater photography has been greatly impacted and improved because of the digital revolution. Being able to see and edit your shots before you leave the water is an incredible advantage. Back in the stone age of film cameras you had to wait until your trip was over and your film was processed before you even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Underwater photography has been greatly impacted and improved because of the digital revolution. Being able to see and edit your shots before you leave the water is an incredible advantage. Back in the stone age of film cameras you had to wait until your trip was over and your film was processed before you even knew you had made a mistake that could have cost you some or all of your photos. It is not difficult to see that digital imaging has greatly improved underwater photography, and all photography for that matter. Another blessing of underwater digital cameras is that while technology is constantly improving, prices are constantly dropping. — <font color="#00A121">Benz</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://affordabledigitalcamera.blogoffer.net/2010/05/05/olympus-underwater-digital-camera-review/">affordabledigitalcamera.blogoffer.net</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Underwater" rel="tag">Underwater</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-underwater-digital-camera-review-benz-afforfable-digital-camera/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-underwater-digital-camera-review-benz-afforfable-digital-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus 9-18mm f/4-5.6 ED M.Zuiko Digital (Tested) &#8211; Andrew Alexander (SLR Gear)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-9-18mm-f4-5-6-ed-m-zuiko-digital-tested-andrew-alexander-slr-gear/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-9-18mm-f4-5-6-ed-m-zuiko-digital-tested-andrew-alexander-slr-gear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-18mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuiko]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-9-18mm-f4-5-6-ed-m-zuiko-digital-tested-andrew-alexander-slr-gear/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second M.Zuiko series lens we have tested, the first being Olympus&#8217; diminutive 17mm prime. The M.Zuiko lens series is designed specifically for Olympus&#8217; PEN series of digital interchangeable lens bodies. The 9-18mm ƒ/4-5.6 lens uses some revolutionary components, including a new lens element called a &#8221;Dual-sided Super Aspherical&#8221; lens. The lens element [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>This is the second M.Zuiko series lens we have tested, the first being Olympus&#8217; diminutive 17mm prime. The M.Zuiko lens series is designed specifically for Olympus&#8217; PEN series of digital interchangeable lens bodies.</p>
<p>The 9-18mm ƒ/4-5.6 lens uses some revolutionary components, including a new lens element called a &#8221;Dual-sided Super Aspherical&#8221; lens. The lens element has a remarkable shape and must require some pretty amazing moulds to make. In addition, the lens is designed with video in mind, using a new silent autofocus motor. — <font color="#00A121">Andrew Alexander</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1321/cat/15">slrgear.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/9-18mm" rel="tag">9-18mm</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Digital" rel="tag">Digital</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Zuiko" rel="tag">Zuiko</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-9-18mm-f4-5-6-ed-m-zuiko-digital-tested-andrew-alexander-slr-gear/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-9-18mm-f4-5-6-ed-m-zuiko-digital-tested-andrew-alexander-slr-gear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus E-PL1 &#8211;  Photoxels</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-photoxels/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-photoxels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 23:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-photoxels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple and powerful. The Olympus E-PL1 is a Digital Interchangeable Lens (DIL) camera that takes all the features of its bigger brothers, the E-P1 and E-P2, and packages them into a consumer-friendly point-and-shoot camera. — Photoxels Source and Read More: photoxels.com &#160; Tags: E-PL1, Olympus, Review]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Simple and powerful. The Olympus E-PL1 is a Digital Interchangeable Lens (DIL) camera that takes all the features of its bigger brothers, the E-P1 and E-P2, and packages them into a consumer-friendly point-and-shoot camera. — <font color="#00A121">Photoxels</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.photoxels.com/cameras/olympus-e-pl1/">photoxels.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/E-PL1" rel="tag">E-PL1</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-photoxels/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-olympus-e-pl1-photoxels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus Stylus 1030SW Waterproof Camera &#8211; Erik (Aloha Update)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-stylus-1030sw-waterproof-camera-erik-aloha-update/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-stylus-1030sw-waterproof-camera-erik-aloha-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stylus 1030SW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterproof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-stylus-1030sw-waterproof-camera-erik-aloha-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have already read our overview and review of the necessity of having an Olympus waterproof camera on your Hawaii vacation or at least one like it, but I’d like to follow that up with a review of the model we currently have and the reasons we’re going to try and get another one. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>You may have already read our overview and review of the necessity of having an Olympus waterproof camera on your Hawaii vacation or at least one like it, but I’d like to follow that up with a review of the model we currently have and the reasons we’re going to try and get another one. — <font color="#00A121">Erik</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.alohaupdate.com/2010/04/27/review-of-the-olympus-stylus-1030sw-waterproof-camera/">alohaupdate.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Camera" rel="tag">Camera</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Stylus+1030SW" rel="tag">Stylus 1030SW</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Waterproof" rel="tag">Waterproof</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-stylus-1030sw-waterproof-camera-erik-aloha-update/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-stylus-1030sw-waterproof-camera-erik-aloha-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus E-PL1 &#124; Digital Camera Review &#8211; LetsGoDigital</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-digital-camera-review-letsgodigital/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-digital-camera-review-letsgodigital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-digital-camera-review-letsgodigital/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympus has a lot of confidence in the Micro Four Thirds System. Within a short time after the introduction of the first digital PEN, Olympus has already introduced two new models. The first one was the more luxurious E-P2, and the second one is a model for the regular consumer, the Olympus E-PL1. — LetsGoDigital [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Olympus has a lot of confidence in the Micro Four Thirds System. Within a short time after the introduction of the first digital PEN, Olympus has already introduced two new models. The first one was the more luxurious E-P2, and the second one is a model for the regular consumer, the Olympus E-PL1. — <font color="#00A121">LetsGoDigital</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/camera/review/218/page_1.html">letsgodigital.org</a></strong></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-digital-camera-review-letsgodigital/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-digital-camera-review-letsgodigital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Olympus E-PL1 (black, with 14-42mm lens) &#8211; Lori Grunin (cnet)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-black-with-14-42mm-lens-lori-grunin-cnet/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-black-with-14-42mm-lens-lori-grunin-cnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Pl1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-black-with-14-42mm-lens-lori-grunin-cnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first round of interchangeable-lens cameras offered a lot to appeal to enthusiasts, but at prices upward of $800, they weren&#8217;t quite a no-brainer for point-and-shooters in search of an upgrade. The bigger sensors in these models can generally deliver better photo quality at somewhat higher ISO sensitivities than the smaller snapshot models and they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>The first round of interchangeable-lens cameras offered a lot to appeal to enthusiasts, but at prices upward of $800, they weren&#8217;t quite a no-brainer for point-and-shooters in search of an upgrade. The bigger sensors in these models can generally deliver better photo quality at somewhat higher ISO sensitivities than the smaller snapshot models and they support video capture, but the alternative has been the moderately larger dSLRs with action-friendly optical viewfinders and kit prices starting at a significantly lower $600.&#160; — <font color="#800000">Lori Grunin</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/olympus-e-pl1-black/4505-6501_7-33958436.html?tag=nl.e725">cnet.com</a></strong></p>
<div class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:5ad31323-db2d-4727-8e42-1ac1bb980fb0" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Olympus" rel="tag">Olympus</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/E-Pl1" rel="tag">E-Pl1</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></div>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-black-with-14-42mm-lens-lori-grunin-cnet/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/04/review-olympus-e-pl1-black-with-14-42mm-lens-lori-grunin-cnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo Reviews From the Web / 20-August-2008</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NX2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixlr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoreviewtoday.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following reviews were reported on Photo News Today on 20-August-2008: Review: Samsung NV24HD digital camera www.pcw.co.uk Just Published! Pentax 35mm &#402;/2.8 DA Macro Limited Review theonlinephotographer.typepad.com Canon EF 800mm f/5.6 L IS USM Lens Review www.the-digital-picture.com Kodak V1073 and V1273 www.trustedreviews.com Review: Capture NX 2 www.creativepro.com Olympus E-520 review www.dpreview.com Pixlr is a great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>The following reviews were reported on <a href="http://www.photonewstoday.com/"><strong>Photo News Today</strong></a> on 20-August-2008:</p>
<p><strong>Review: Samsung NV24HD digital camera</strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6nb2zq">www.pcw.co.uk</a></p>
<p><strong>Just Published! Pentax 35mm &fnof;/2.8 DA Macro Limited Review</strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6ljktn">theonlinephotographer.typepad.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Canon EF 800mm f/5.6 L IS USM Lens Review</strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6amud5">www.the-digital-picture.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Kodak V1073 and V1273</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2008/08/20/Kodak-V1073-and-V1273/p1">www.trustedreviews.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Review: Capture NX 2</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.creativepro.com/article/review-capture-nx-2">www.creativepro.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Olympus E-520 review</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08082001Olympuse520.asp">www.dpreview.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Pixlr is a great free online photo editing program</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.gadgetell.com/tech/comment/pixlr-is-a-great-free-online-photo-editing-program/">www.gadgetell.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Canon&#8217;s EOS Rebel XS / 1000D DSLR hits the test bench</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/20/canons-eos-rebel-xs-1000d-dslr-hits-the-test-bench/">www.engadget.com</a></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
