<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photo Review Today&#187; [REVIEW:] Kodak PlaySport Zx3 waterproof HD camera review &#8211;  Paul Miller (engadget) / Kodak /</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photoreviewtoday.com/tag/kodak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com</link>
	<description>Photographic reviews from around the planet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Kodak PlaySport Zx3 waterproof HD camera review &#8211;  Paul Miller (engadget)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-waterproof-hd-camera-review-paul-miller-engadget/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-waterproof-hd-camera-review-paul-miller-engadget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 11:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlaySport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterproof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zx3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-waterproof-hd-camera-review-paul-miller-engadget/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have plenty of gripes with the current crop of pocket cameras, most of them to do with image quality: grainy footage, poor (laughable) low-light performance, a lack of autofocus, digital zoom, gimmicky 1080p, and so forth. The new Kodak PlaySport Zx3 HD Waterproof Video Camera solves none of those problems. But you can put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>We have plenty of gripes with the current crop of pocket cameras, most of them to do with image quality: grainy footage, poor (laughable) low-light performance, a lack of autofocus, digital zoom, gimmicky 1080p, and so forth. The new Kodak PlaySport Zx3 HD Waterproof Video Camera solves none of those problems. But you can put it underwater. So, all is forgiven.  —  <font color="#00A121">Paul Miller</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/27/kodak-playsport-zx3-waterproof-hd-camera-review/">engadget.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Kodak" rel="tag">Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/PlaySport" rel="tag">PlaySport</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Waterproof" rel="tag">Waterproof</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Zx3" rel="tag">Zx3</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-waterproof-hd-camera-review-paul-miller-engadget/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-waterproof-hd-camera-review-paul-miller-engadget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Kodak PlaySport Zx3 HD Camera [review] &#8211; John Biehler</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-hd-camera-review-john-biehler/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-hd-camera-review-john-biehler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 11:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlaySport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zx3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-hd-camera-review-john-biehler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got back from a Hawaiian vacation. Before I left, I waffled on what camera gear to bring. I had previously purchased a waterproof ‘bag’ that would fit my Kodak Zx1 camera but wasn’t too jazzed about using it since the back of the bag was blue rather than clear so while I’d be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>I just got back from a Hawaiian vacation. Before I left, I waffled on what camera gear to bring. I had previously purchased a waterproof ‘bag’ that would fit my Kodak Zx1 camera but wasn’t too jazzed about using it since the back of the bag was blue rather than clear so while I’d be able to use it, I wouldn’t be able to see the screen while shooting.  — <font color="#00A121">John Biehler</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://johnbiehler.com/2010/05/25/kodak-playsport-zx3-hd-camera-review/">johnbiehler.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Kodak" rel="tag">Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/PlaySport" rel="tag">PlaySport</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Zx3" rel="tag">Zx3</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-hd-camera-review-john-biehler/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-playsport-zx3-hd-camera-review-john-biehler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Kodak M550 Camera Review &#8211; Astonishing Value &#8211; Image Acquire</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m550-camera-review-astonishing-value-image-acquire/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m550-camera-review-astonishing-value-image-acquire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 11:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M550]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m550-camera-review-astonishing-value-image-acquire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kodak’s line of cameras have always been a source of terrific models. Admittedly, they’ve had some missteps, but for the most part, you can count on a Kodak to come through in the clutch. And today, you’ll get the perfect example of such a thing with our review of the Kodak M550. — Image Acquire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Kodak’s line of cameras have always been a source of terrific models.  Admittedly, they’ve had some missteps, but for the most part, you can count on a Kodak to come through in the clutch.  And today, you’ll get the perfect example of such a thing with our review of the Kodak M550. — <font color="#00A121">Image Acquire</font></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.image-acquire.com/kodak-m550-camera-review-astonishing-value/">image-acquire.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Eastman+Kodak" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Kodak" rel="tag">Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/M550" rel="tag">M550</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m550-camera-review-astonishing-value-image-acquire/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m550-camera-review-astonishing-value-image-acquire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Kodak vs. Pandigital photo frames &#8211; Jefferson Graham (Technology Live)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-jefferson-graham-technology-live/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-jefferson-graham-technology-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 12:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pandigital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Frames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-jefferson-graham-technology-live/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital photo frames are a cool idea, but consumers tend to tire of them shortly after their purchase, because they never get around to putting new photos into the mix. So digital frame manufacturers Kodak and Pandigital both came up a similar solution &#8212; what if friends could e-mail pictures directly to the frame? That [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Digital photo frames are a cool idea, but consumers tend to tire of them shortly after their purchase, because they never get around to putting new photos into the mix.</p>
<p>So digital frame manufacturers Kodak and Pandigital both came up a similar solution &#8212; what if friends could e-mail pictures directly to the frame? That way, there would always be some new fresh material, guaranteed. — <font color="#00A121">Jefferson Graham</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/05/review-digital-photo-frames/1?csp=34&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TP-TechnologyLive+%28Tech+-+Technology+Live%29">usatoday.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Eastman+Kodak" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Kodak" rel="tag">Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pandigital" rel="tag">Pandigital</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Photo+Frames" rel="tag">Photo Frames</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-jefferson-graham-technology-live/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-jefferson-graham-technology-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Kodak vs. Pandigital photo frames &#8211; Technology Live</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-technology-live/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-technology-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 10:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pandigital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Frames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-technology-live/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital photo frames are a cool idea, but consumers tend to tire of them shortly after their purchase, because they never get around to putting new photos into the mix. So digital frame manufacturers Kodak and Pandigital both came up a similar solution &#8212; what if friends could e-mail pictures directly to the frame? That [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Digital photo frames are a cool idea, but consumers tend to tire of them shortly after their purchase, because they never get around to putting new photos into the mix.</p>
<p>So digital frame manufacturers Kodak and Pandigital both came up a similar solution &#8212; what if friends could e-mail pictures directly to the frame? That way, there would always be some new fresh material, guaranteed. — <font color="#00A121">Technology Live</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/05/review-digital-photo-frames/1">usatoday.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Kodak" rel="tag">Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pandigital" rel="tag">Pandigital</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Photo+Frames" rel="tag">Photo Frames</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-technology-live/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-vs-pandigital-photo-frames-technology-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Kodak M530 Camera Review–Bare Bones Camera, Bare Bones Price &#8211; Image Acquire</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m530-camera-review%e2%80%93bare-bones-camera-bare-bones-price-image-acquire/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m530-camera-review%e2%80%93bare-bones-camera-bare-bones-price-image-acquire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 11:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bare Bones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M530]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m530-camera-review%e2%80%93bare-bones-camera-bare-bones-price-image-acquire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kodak has always been one of the big names in digital camera, so when I take a look at one of these, I’m always fairly sure of how it’ll turn out. Sometimes I’m surprised, one way or the other, but more often than not I’m just satisfied. Today is one of those days, and today, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Kodak has always been one of the big names in digital camera, so when I take a look at one of these, I’m always fairly sure of how it’ll turn out.  Sometimes I’m surprised, one way or the other, but more often than not I’m just satisfied.  Today is one of those days, and today, we’re talking about the Kodak M530. — <font color="#00A121">Image Acquire</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More:</small> <a href="http://www.image-acquire.com/kodak-m530-camera-review-bare-bones-camera-bare-bones-price/">image-acquire.com</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><small>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bare+Bones" rel="tag">Bare Bones</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Kodak" rel="tag">Kodak</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/M530" rel="tag">M530</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></small></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m530-camera-review%e2%80%93bare-bones-camera-bare-bones-price-image-acquire/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/05/review-kodak-m530-camera-review%e2%80%93bare-bones-camera-bare-bones-price-image-acquire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[REVIEW:] Kodak ESP 5250 All-In-One Printer &#8211; M. David Stone (PC MAG)</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/03/review-kodak-esp-5250-all-in-one-printer-m-david-stone-pc-mag/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/03/review-kodak-esp-5250-all-in-one-printer-m-david-stone-pc-mag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All-In-One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESP 5250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/03/review-kodak-esp-5250-all-in-one-printer-m-david-stone-pc-mag/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The difference between home and home office multi-function printers (MFPs) keeps getting less and less clear. Where there was once a bright line (as lawyers like to call it) between the two, there&#8217;s now a wide fuzzy gray area. Few printers make that point as well as the Kodak ESP 5250 All-In-One Printer ($149.99 direct).&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>The difference between home and home office multi-function printers (MFPs) keeps getting less and less clear. Where there was once a bright line (as lawyers like to call it) between the two, there&#8217;s now a wide fuzzy gray area. Few printers make that point as well as the Kodak ESP 5250 All-In-One Printer ($149.99 direct).&#160; — <font color="#800000">M. David Stone</font></p>
<p><strong><small>Source and Read More: </small><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2361587,00.asp?kc=PCRSS05039TX1K0000754">pcmag.com</a> </strong></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<div class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:643abdf5-1cd5-479d-a4fd-10081dc041e9" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Kodak" rel="tag">Kodak</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/ESP+5250" rel="tag">ESP 5250</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/All-In-One" rel="tag">All-In-One</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Printer" rel="tag">Printer</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Review" rel="tag">Review</a></div>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/03/review-kodak-esp-5250-all-in-one-printer-m-david-stone-pc-mag/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2010/03/review-kodak-esp-5250-all-in-one-printer-m-david-stone-pc-mag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo Reviews From the Web / 20-August-2008</title>
		<link>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NX2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixlr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoreviewtoday.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following reviews were reported on Photo News Today on 20-August-2008: Review: Samsung NV24HD digital camera www.pcw.co.uk Just Published! Pentax 35mm &#402;/2.8 DA Macro Limited Review theonlinephotographer.typepad.com Canon EF 800mm f/5.6 L IS USM Lens Review www.the-digital-picture.com Kodak V1073 and V1273 www.trustedreviews.com Review: Capture NX 2 www.creativepro.com Olympus E-520 review www.dpreview.com Pixlr is a great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>The following reviews were reported on <a href="http://www.photonewstoday.com/"><strong>Photo News Today</strong></a> on 20-August-2008:</p>
<p><strong>Review: Samsung NV24HD digital camera</strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6nb2zq">www.pcw.co.uk</a></p>
<p><strong>Just Published! Pentax 35mm &fnof;/2.8 DA Macro Limited Review</strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6ljktn">theonlinephotographer.typepad.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Canon EF 800mm f/5.6 L IS USM Lens Review</strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6amud5">www.the-digital-picture.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Kodak V1073 and V1273</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2008/08/20/Kodak-V1073-and-V1273/p1">www.trustedreviews.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Review: Capture NX 2</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.creativepro.com/article/review-capture-nx-2">www.creativepro.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Olympus E-520 review</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08082001Olympuse520.asp">www.dpreview.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Pixlr is a great free online photo editing program</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.gadgetell.com/tech/comment/pixlr-is-a-great-free-online-photo-editing-program/">www.gadgetell.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Canon&#8217;s EOS Rebel XS / 1000D DSLR hits the test bench</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/20/canons-eos-rebel-xs-1000d-dslr-hits-the-test-bench/">www.engadget.com</a></p>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/?i=http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photoreviewtoday.com/2008/08/photo-reviews-from-the-web-20-august-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
